Meth, Medicine and Jury Duty
In the old days, medical providers were often excused from jury duty because of the importance of their jobs, but no longer.
Not that I would have tried to get out of this important (and interesting) responsibility of being an American citizen, but I sure would have like to do it at another time. The fall and winter season is absolutely brutal in a pediatric practice and I tend to work 13-14 hour days. Missing a week of work will put me behind until next May.
However, I know that my job is no more essential than the other hundred people that crowded the jury room. No one seemed particularly excited about being there. I guess I could have petitioned for a postponement, but I am convinced it would have been six months from now when I planned a vacation. I could have told them I had diarrhea, but I didn't.
I rarely win anything, but I did win a seat on a criminal trial. The good news is that it promised to be a short one; only about three days. As we sat there with our impartial demeanors, the attorneys took turns interviewing and asking us question to see if we would be biased or sympathetic or problematic or whatever. I answered those questions truthfully (of course). Yes, I had friends in law enforcement. Yes, my son is an attorney. Yes, I have been a victim of crime (someone stole my wife's car...twice!). Yes, I have treated patients who were methamphetamine users. None of those answers apparently mattered, because both attorneys allowed me to sit for this trial.
My medical knowledge came back to haunt me, however, when I heard the "expert witnesses" on the stand giving out erroneous information about the neurological effects of stimulants. Apparently, they just make things up if they don't know the answer. I did learn a lot about what police officers have to endure to get a drug charge to stick. Later, in the jury room, they turned to me to explain lab results, and the significance of those DUI field tests.
My eleven fellow jurors were nice, local people - businessmen, real estate salesmen, dot.com people, housewives, an arborist - a nice mix. But, there is always ONE in a crowd that rubs you the wrong way. The know-it-all. The bizarre scenario creator. The Doubting Thomas. I now know why they took my little penknife at security. He caused all of us to deliberate for another day. Perhaps it was for the best, since no one should render a verdict when they are tired, frustrated, confused, or annoyed.
What seemed to be a slam-dunk conviction was really more complicated than it seemed, and it was heartening to hear all of those different views from people that I have never met before. Profound insight flooded our jury chamber as we struggled to make the right decision. Medical people seem to tolerate ambiguity a bit better than, say truck drivers, but slowly...and carefully, we came to a consensus with our verdicts. Medical people are used to making important, life-altering decisions within a 15-minute appointment, not something that most people can do and probably not something medical providers really should do.
POSTSCRIPT: The defendent was convicted on all four counts. The jury did the right thing. Subsequently, the judge informed us that this was his third strike.
Related Topics: Does America Have a Meth Problem?, Meth 101
Technorati Tags: juryduty, criminaltrial, methamphetamines
Not that I would have tried to get out of this important (and interesting) responsibility of being an American citizen, but I sure would have like to do it at another time. The fall and winter season is absolutely brutal in a pediatric practice and I tend to work 13-14 hour days. Missing a week of work will put me behind until next May.
However, I know that my job is no more essential than the other hundred people that crowded the jury room. No one seemed particularly excited about being there. I guess I could have petitioned for a postponement, but I am convinced it would have been six months from now when I planned a vacation. I could have told them I had diarrhea, but I didn't.
I rarely win anything, but I did win a seat on a criminal trial. The good news is that it promised to be a short one; only about three days. As we sat there with our impartial demeanors, the attorneys took turns interviewing and asking us question to see if we would be biased or sympathetic or problematic or whatever. I answered those questions truthfully (of course). Yes, I had friends in law enforcement. Yes, my son is an attorney. Yes, I have been a victim of crime (someone stole my wife's car...twice!). Yes, I have treated patients who were methamphetamine users. None of those answers apparently mattered, because both attorneys allowed me to sit for this trial.
My medical knowledge came back to haunt me, however, when I heard the "expert witnesses" on the stand giving out erroneous information about the neurological effects of stimulants. Apparently, they just make things up if they don't know the answer. I did learn a lot about what police officers have to endure to get a drug charge to stick. Later, in the jury room, they turned to me to explain lab results, and the significance of those DUI field tests.
My eleven fellow jurors were nice, local people - businessmen, real estate salesmen, dot.com people, housewives, an arborist - a nice mix. But, there is always ONE in a crowd that rubs you the wrong way. The know-it-all. The bizarre scenario creator. The Doubting Thomas. I now know why they took my little penknife at security. He caused all of us to deliberate for another day. Perhaps it was for the best, since no one should render a verdict when they are tired, frustrated, confused, or annoyed.
What seemed to be a slam-dunk conviction was really more complicated than it seemed, and it was heartening to hear all of those different views from people that I have never met before. Profound insight flooded our jury chamber as we struggled to make the right decision. Medical people seem to tolerate ambiguity a bit better than, say truck drivers, but slowly...and carefully, we came to a consensus with our verdicts. Medical people are used to making important, life-altering decisions within a 15-minute appointment, not something that most people can do and probably not something medical providers really should do.
POSTSCRIPT: The defendent was convicted on all four counts. The jury did the right thing. Subsequently, the judge informed us that this was his third strike.
Related Topics: Does America Have a Meth Problem?, Meth 101
Technorati Tags: juryduty, criminaltrial, methamphetamines






