Total or Partial Knee Replacement?
About 60% of the questions on my Joint Replacement Message Board concern the differences, pros and cons of total knee replacement and partial knee replacement surgery.
Knee replacement has nowhere near the patient satisfaction of hip replacement or unicompartmental knee replacement. Period. There is NO controversy about this. Patient satisfaction ranges fron 65% to 90% depending on the study and how in depth the questioning is.
More than a few patients who have undergone total knee replacements are unsatisfied. There are many factors that contribute:
Let me explain. I saw a patient who, in my opinion, (after over 350 partial knee replacements and 1200 total knee replacements) was a CLASSIC partial knee candidate. I discussed with him both options. He then went for a second opinion to a well-known joint replacement hospital in Manhattan. The surgeon got close to 12 separate x-rays and carefully described to him all the complex reasons why he needed a total knee replacement. The patient told me about this.
I asked the patient one question: "Did you ask how many partial knee replacements this doctor has performed in his life?" The patient said "no." I then told the patient the truth that this doctor, while respected in the joint replacement industry NEVER performed a partial knee replacement in his 25-30 years of practice. Therefore--when your only tool is a hammer--everything looks like a nail...Enough said.
Get an opinion from someone who regularly performs both operations. Do not settle for surgeons that are stuck in old technology, have residents do the surgery, or fail to give the patients balanced opinions.
Currently 50% of my knee replacements are unicompartmental (partial knee) and the patient satisfaction levels are superior. We will see a shift in the coming years to alternative procedures to a total knee replacement due to the high level of patient dissatisfaction with total knee replacements.
Related Topics: Joint Replacement: Less is Sometimes More, Joint Replacement (Sponsored), Targeting Arthritis
Knee replacement has nowhere near the patient satisfaction of hip replacement or unicompartmental knee replacement. Period. There is NO controversy about this. Patient satisfaction ranges fron 65% to 90% depending on the study and how in depth the questioning is.
More than a few patients who have undergone total knee replacements are unsatisfied. There are many factors that contribute:
- Patient perception
- Patient expectaton
- Underlying disease
- Associated spine and hip problems
- Scar development
Let me explain. I saw a patient who, in my opinion, (after over 350 partial knee replacements and 1200 total knee replacements) was a CLASSIC partial knee candidate. I discussed with him both options. He then went for a second opinion to a well-known joint replacement hospital in Manhattan. The surgeon got close to 12 separate x-rays and carefully described to him all the complex reasons why he needed a total knee replacement. The patient told me about this.
I asked the patient one question: "Did you ask how many partial knee replacements this doctor has performed in his life?" The patient said "no." I then told the patient the truth that this doctor, while respected in the joint replacement industry NEVER performed a partial knee replacement in his 25-30 years of practice. Therefore--when your only tool is a hammer--everything looks like a nail...Enough said.
Get an opinion from someone who regularly performs both operations. Do not settle for surgeons that are stuck in old technology, have residents do the surgery, or fail to give the patients balanced opinions.
Currently 50% of my knee replacements are unicompartmental (partial knee) and the patient satisfaction levels are superior. We will see a shift in the coming years to alternative procedures to a total knee replacement due to the high level of patient dissatisfaction with total knee replacements.
Related Topics: Joint Replacement: Less is Sometimes More, Joint Replacement (Sponsored), Targeting Arthritis
Technorati Tags:



