WebMD Blogs

WebMD News Watch

WebMD's editorial staff on the latest news from the world of health.

Thursday, July 23, 2009

Health Care Reform: Now or Never?
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

By Andy Miller
WebMD Guest Blogger


Midnight, New Year's Eve, 2009.

Conventional wisdom says that if major health care reform hasn't passed Congress by then, it may not be revived for years, if at all.

Why is it now or (maybe) never?

This year offers an unusual alignment of stars that makes health reform's chances better than at any time since 1993, when Bill and Hillary Clinton launched an overhaul plan that later fizzled in Congress.

The confluence of favorable 2009 factors starts with political realities.

President Obama, a popular leader in his first year in office, has robust Democratic majorities in both houses of Congress. He clearly upped the stakes in recent days, and again in a televised news conference Wednesday night, on the importance of getting health reform done now.

But if major legislation isn't approved this year, Congress enters an election year in 2010, when it typically avoids the big-idea bills. The next year begins a presidential election cycle, notes Julius Hobson, senior adviser on health care for Bryan Cave, a law firm. "It's now or never -- that's why the president is pressing Congress,'' Hobson says.

Secondly, unlike during the Clintons' flameout, major medical stakeholders have stepped up to support reform efforts.

That includes the health insurance industry. Insurers have agreed to not reject applicants due to pre-existing medical conditions, as long as everyone is required to have coverage. The industry behind the potent anti-reform "Harry and Louise'' ads in the '90s is now on board, albeit with an asterisk: Health insurers fiercely oppose a public insurance option run by the government.

The American Medical Association has thrown its support to the House Democrats' plan, though not all physicians would agree. Hospitals have agreed to some concessions to help pay for health reform, as has the pharmaceutical industry.

And retail giant Wal-Mart, whose health benefits plans have drawn strong criticism in the past, has endorsed a requirement that employers provide insurance to workers.

"There is tremendous momentum,'' says Ken Thorpe, an Emory University health policy expert. "The stage is set.''

While this coalition has given reform a big boost, the interest groups also have objected to certain proposals. "Everybody wants reform,'' Hobson says. "Everybody has something they like, but everybody has something they dislike, too.''

Reform opponents, meanwhile, appear to be gathering strength. Bradley Blakeman, a Republican strategist, said in response to Obama's news conference, "The president is selling a product that no one wants. He is desperate and refuses to pull the plug on health care legislation that even Democrats concede is DOA.''

Conservative "Blue Dog" Democrats are balking at proposed new taxes and inadequate health cost containment in various reform plans.

And polls show that public confidence on health reform is slipping. CNN released a poll of polls Wednesday that found less than half the country approves of how Obama is handling the issue.

Obama targeted those public perceptions Wednesday night -- and the issue of how it affects the average taxpayer: the ''What's in this for me?'' question.

"This is not just about the 47 million Americans who don't have any health insurance at all,'' he said. "Reform is about every American who has ever feared that they may lose their coverage if they become too sick, or lose their job, or change their job. It's about every small business that has been forced to lay off employees or cut back on their coverage because it became too expensive … If we do not control these costs, we will not be able to control our deficit. If we do not reform health care, your premiums and out-of-pocket costs will continue to skyrocket. If we don't act, 14,000 Americans will continue to lose their health insurance every single day.''

He returned later to that pocketbook problem. "Premiums for families that have health insurance have doubled over the last 10 years,'' he said. "They've gone up three times faster than wages … Employers are going to put more and more costs on employees or they're just going to stop providing health care altogether."

Other health care statistics are worsening, too. A Gallup poll released Wednesday found 16% of American adults -- one in six -- are uninsured. That's up from an average of 14.8% among those interviewed in 2008.

The U.S. spends much more on health care than other countries, yet the medical results are worse than many nations, Obama also noted.

His push on health reform undoubtedly will continue through the summer and into the fall, to get a bill this year. "Everyone recognizes that inaction will make all the problems infinitely worse,'' Hobson says.

Still, E. Richard Brown, director of the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research and an expert on health reform, says 2009 is not the last chance for reform.

It could come together again in 2011, if defeated this year, Brown says. "If we don't get it done now, the same pressures will be there in two years.''

Yet Brown also sees 2009 as a prime opportunity. "It's an opportunity we cannot afford to pass up. I do think this moment is a rare moment, an alignment of different interest groups. ''

SOURCES: Julius Hobson, senior policy adviser, Bryan Cave LLP; Ken Thorpe, professor, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University; E. Richard Brown, director, UCLA Center for Health Policy Research; New York Times web site; CNN web site; Politico, The Arena; American Medical Association; California Healthline web site; Gallup Poll.

Posted by: Sean_webmd at 5:44 PM

7 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

The information that is not being presented is the pros vs. the cons. We understand that the government can reduce the premium costs but at what sacrifice? The president was asked this question and avoided it all together. Will we have to wait in long lines for health care? Will our business have to incur an additional payroll tax? Will taxes be raised on items that government deems as luxury items?

Lastly I wonder.. Why do residents from other countries that currently have nationalized healthcare come to the US for treatment if ours is inferior to theirs???? hmmm...

Jul 24, 2009 12:19:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I fully agree with the Anonymous and I am asking the same questions. And I also wonder why our legislators want to keep their current medical insurances and don't want to join the plan they are constructing for us.

Jul 24, 2009 2:48:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wonder where your information comes from anonymous, many people go to other countries for better healthcare depending on their specific medical needs. We must have reform in Healthcare, I begs to ask the question, "Have you ever had to keep a job you hate just to keep your family insured or when you have worked to keep your benefits just to find your insurance refuses to pay for the treatment you need or your child needs and finally maybe your doctor refuses to accept the insurance you are covered by because they have so many problems being paid by your insurance company that they can't afford it?" So hmmmm??? I wonder if you acknowledge there is a huge problem because I have personally seen all of this.

Jul 24, 2009 4:26:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As a orthopedic physical therapist and clinic owner I agree with anonymous. This healthcare "reform" plan calls for "standards of care" when healthcare is in question. What this means for patients is that you have to fit into the "standard" for any type of tests to be run or for benefits such as physical therapy, surgery, etc. to be accessed. Furthermore, there will be an "approval" process where patients must be approved for anything beyond standard. Basically the government will run a giant HMO that limits patient care and access. If you wonder why lawmakers do not want that type of coverage it is because they do not want lesser coverage than they already have. I personally had an ex CIA patient that was authorized for 375 physical therapy visits a year. This is crazy and most private insurance companies (Blue Cross/ Blue Shield) offer around 20 visits a year without pre-authorization. If you would like to live in a country where you have health coverage but no choices related to this type of coverage, then you should support the plan. If you like to pick your MD's, hospitals, and have a say in your coverage, DO NOT support this plan!!!

Jul 24, 2009 5:01:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems that now one is understanding that if you have health insurance that you like you can keep it and I am sure that we all will. This positive is that those who do not have insurance and are not eligible for Medicare (are under 65) or Medicaid (have earned income) would have an option of a an insurance run by the government which might cover less than what you have but would be better than the nothing that they have now which caused them to go to the hospital emergency room when they are sick. The $3000 visit to the emergency room would become a $350 visit to the doctor. This coverage might not have all the bells and whistles that your coverage has but again it is better for the individual who does have coverage. The other point that most are missing is that if our economy and government do not get a handle on rapidly rising costs and profits in the health care industry (including insurance and parmaceuticals) medicare will not be able to pay for all of us baby boomers when we turn 65 (not so far off). At that time (maybe 5 years) we will have a complete meltdown ( and your current health care will not cover you after 65, think of that!

Jul 28, 2009 4:03:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My question is are we old folks going to be put out to pasture, if you will, or will we have to pay more for our medical then we do already? Or should we just go off somewhere and die. Your grand parents,people???????????????????

Aug 3, 2009 8:33:00 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The plan(s) as they are now will raise our costs and give us less. And those of us who have health insurance will lose what we have.

Aug 6, 2009 10:24:00 AM  

Post a Comment

The opinions expressed in the WebMD Blogs are of the author and the author alone. They do not reflect the opinions of WebMD and they have not been reviewed by a WebMD physician or any member of the WebMD editorial staff for accuracy, balance or objectivity. WebMD Blogs are not a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Never delay or disregard seeking professional medical advice from your physician or other qualified health provider because of something you have read on WebMD. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service or treatment. If you think you have a medical emergency, call your doctor or dial 911 immediately.