WebMD Blogs
Icon

Cholesterol Management 101

High cholesterol is at the root of many conditions, including heart disease. Michael Richman, MD, FACS is here to show you how to manage your cholesterol levels effectively.

background

WebMD Health News

December 31, 2007

Statins and the Liver

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Happy New Year!  We recently started a series in which we will be discussing the safety of all the different classes of medications used in Cholesterol Management. As I stated in the last post, all the information is current and evidence-based. It is provided by the National Lipid Association and was published in the American Journal of Cardiology.

I am asked on a daily basis if statins are safe.  I always respond that they are and also are one of the most studied medications. All medicines have both a generic and a brand name but I am sure most people only know the brand names so I will list them for you. The statins include Lipitor, Zocor, Vytorin, Mevacor, Crestor, Pravachol, and Lescol.

When The National Lipid Association Statin Safety Task Force wrote their report, each panel of experts wrote about a different area of the body in which any of these medications had been shown to affect in some way. We will begin with the Liver.

Concerned patients often ask if their statin will damage their liver? Let's start with the final conclusion of the Report of the Expert Liver Panel and then detail how they came to this conclusion.
"Outside of measuring liver biochemistries for the purpose of periodically updating a patient's medical history, we can find no scientific or medical basis for monitoring aminotransferase levels during long-term statin therapy as a measure to enhance patient safety. We acknowledge that the Panel's recommendations are at odds with current prescribing information for marketed statins: however, we are optimistic that the regulatory agencies and pharmaceutical industry will update their recommendations to be consistent with evidence-based data cited in this article."
What does this mean? Well, it simply means that all the liver function tests, which are commonly known as AST and ALT levels, that one's physician routinely draws to check for liver problems are unnecessary with the exception of updating labs during an annual physical exam or if the physician having some concrete reason to do so. The evidence-based data shows that routinely performing these tests do not make statins any safer.

The available data does not support doing so in the "asymptomatic" patient on a statin. Why do they say this? The reason the Panel says this is, believe it or not
"Very rare case reports of liver failure have occurred in patients receiving statin therapy."
Because the association between statin therapy and liver failure is so rare there is absolutely no way one can say with confidence that the liver failure was due to statin use. It is possible that this could be an "idiosyncratic reaction" to the statins. This means that a person could have an unexpected reaction or a type of allergy to the medicine and that is the reason for the liver failure. I like to think of it as the problem is with the way the patient's body responds to the drug rather than the class of drugs causing the problem.

The Liver Panel could find "no direct evidence of death due to liver failure caused by statin therapy." This does not mean that statins will not elevate the liver enzymes -- this is a known side effect. Generally a physician does nothing unless the level is more than 3 times the upper limit of normal but this does not mean that liver damage is occurring. This has been shown to happen less than 1% of the time across the dose range for marketed statins.

I asked a friend of mine who is a liver doctor at the largest hospital in the Western US his opinion on liver problems and statins. He said that he rarely performs liver biopsies any more when patients are on statins and have elevated liver enzymes because he has yet to see a case on statin-induced liver failure. There was always another explanation as to the cause of the liver failure.

My own feeling is that too many physicians stop this medication unnecessarily and forget the benefits of statins in reducing heart disease by at least 40% because they think a small rise in the liver function tests means that there is ongoing damage to the liver. Statins can be used safely in patients with chronic liver disease and well-treated cirrhosis but the physician may need to follow the patient a little more closely than would occur in a normal healthy patient on a statin.

Coming next: The effects of statin use on the kidneys.

Related Topics:

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by: Michael Richman, MD, FACS at 12/31/2007 05:56:00 PM

16 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Michael, would you please comment on dosage of statins. I have been moved from 10 m to 20 m to 40 m. I have a slightly elevated cholesterol level and my internist worries about plaque build-up since I have a slight coronary problem..I am 67 and in good health otherwise.

January 6, 2008 4:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Have any studies been performed to study the correlation of long term statin use and liver cancer?

January 8, 2008 7:54 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would like to thank Dr. Richman on his outstanding series on the safety of lipid lowering medications. As a fellow physician, I can tell you that there is absolutely no evidence that long term statin use causes liver cancer

January 9, 2008 2:30 PM  
Anonymous grizzymann said...

I have been using statins off and on for the past 10 years. In each case when I used statins on a continuous basis, I suffered from sever muscle pain around my waist and lower stomach. I know of several others that experenced the same muscle problems. When I quit the statins for several weeks, the pains went away. I am also suferring from low kidney functions whish may also be related to the statins. Statins are dangerous and other methods to control cholestrol levels must be explored. Doctors are too eager to use statins. Dick M

January 9, 2008 3:51 PM  
Anonymous haloola said...

HALA, would you please let me know if it is safe for me to use 10 mg of cebralex, i have hep c, fibrosis in the liver grade 3/4

January 17, 2008 12:31 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I recently went off Lovstatin after a year due to muscle aches and joint pain. It has been about two months and I still have some muscle symtoms. I exercise three times a week. How long can these symtoms last?

January 28, 2008 11:39 AM  
Anonymous starblue said...

Some advice, please.
I get a free cholesterol test when I give blood. My last one was 146. Do I need to have the whole lipid panel done, or will this be enough of an indicator? It is of some concern as i have no insurance and money is a factor. thank you for your time and consideration. slm

February 6, 2008 12:14 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Statins aside, why would a doctor be concerned about higher levels of something shown by a liver panel? Why are there "dangerous" levels of something the panel measures? These are reasons my cardiologist and internist gave for taking me off Lipitor and putting me on Zetia (though I don't recall which "something" it was). It it's not the "safe" statin, why else would those test results be of concern?

March 31, 2008 12:16 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I drink one or two glasses of wine with dinner. I take 40 mg of generic Zocor daily. The pharmacists note on the pill bottle says "avoid alcohol".

Any comment?

April 7, 2008 5:40 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hi. I would like a comment regarding the medication I was put on when I had a heart attack two years ago. I was put on a statin before a blood test was given. Afterwards, a blood test was taken and my liver enzymes were high. Now I was just told I have a fatty liver. Also, I was a drinker for 20 years. Does the combination of the statin and being a former drinker contibute to this fatty liver?

May 20, 2008 7:48 PM  
Blogger Marc said...

After about 9 weeks on statin's to help raise my good cholesterol I was switched to Niaspan due to extreme fatigue. It's has been 15 months and I am finally starting to have some energy. The fatigue was insidious it started as just being a little tired and gradually increased to the point that I would just lay in bed with no energy and no desire to get up.

July 1, 2008 1:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

My friend took Crestor for two and a half years. She also drank alot of wine, which I'm sure was never reported to her doctor. She developed a huge liver tumor, which was malignant, and died 6 months after diagnosis. Coincidence?

July 4, 2008 10:06 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

i heard that people that have 0 positve blood and have a liver transplant with an 0 positive donor have a greater chance of rejuvination the liver? is this true, my brother and i have damaged livers but he needs a transplant and heard this on discovery and i cant find it. could you help me out?

July 19, 2008 10:58 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Not liver cancer folks....cirrhosis. None drinker Never had a drink had an upper GI 3 years prior no varices in esophogas which is a sign of cirrhosis put on Vytorin and 3 years later cirrhosis and renal failure. Rare side effect you won't think it is rare if it is happening to you. Insist on a liver ultrasound not labwork yearly

August 25, 2008 7:06 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I see many questions posted asking specific questions yet no answers. Who answers the questions for individuals posting?

October 2, 2008 3:49 PM  
Blogger WebMD Blogs said...

Anonymous above,

To ask questions of Dr. Richman, please visit his message board. (Registration required for posting)

Thanks for your question!

October 2, 2008 4:32 PM  

Post a Comment

background