Taste Test Tuesday: The Cooking Spray Quandary
Smart Balance Omega Nonstick Cooking Spray
First of all, let me just say that for the past year I have made it a point to stop using those cans of nonstick cooking sprays. They are so very convenient, but I feel terrible when it comes time to dump them in the recycling bin because I don't know for sure if they are actually recycled; and even still, recycling uses energy and the idea is to not generate any waste. I've been meaning to buy one of those re-usable oil sprayers that are man/woman powered (you pump it with your hands and then spray) rather than propellant powered since the one I had for years seems to have reached the end it its lifecycle, but I just haven't had the chance.
Meanwhile I've been using a silicon pastry brush to coat the pots and pans with canola or olive oil as needed. This has worked well most of the time but there are two problems with the non-cooking-spray technique:
I promised my husband I would purchase another can of cooking spray to tide us over until I locate a good re-usable oil sprayer (it's summer and BBQ season after all), and I found this new Smart Balance Omega nonstick cooking spray. A quick glance at the ingredient label told me that they use a combination of canola, soy and olive oils and a non-chlorofluorocarbon as the propellant.
The confusing part to a consumer might be the conflicting advertising banners on the label:
According to the nutrition information label, each second your finger is on the trigger of the cooking spray can, you are getting about 10 calories and 1.5 grams of total fat - .5 grams of which are polyunsaturated and .5 grams of which are monounsaturated. Okay, I know it's been a while since I was in a math class but I'm getting a total of 1 gram of fat (.5 + .5) when the total grams is 1.5. Where is the other .5 gram coming from? The label says 0 for saturated and trans fat. According to the company, this missing amount of fat is due to the rounding of numbers on the nutrition label.
As far as taste-testing purposes, this product performed very well!
My family is trying to generate less waste in general, so we are using the silicon brush more and the cooking spray can less. (I put it on the highest shelf in my kitchen cabinet so I really have to think about it before I grab it.) The other option is to buy a re-usable oil sprayer (Pampered Chef makes a pretty good one last I checked), buy a desirable oil (it could even be Smart Balance), and use it to to fill your sprayer!
Related Topics:
First of all, let me just say that for the past year I have made it a point to stop using those cans of nonstick cooking sprays. They are so very convenient, but I feel terrible when it comes time to dump them in the recycling bin because I don't know for sure if they are actually recycled; and even still, recycling uses energy and the idea is to not generate any waste. I've been meaning to buy one of those re-usable oil sprayers that are man/woman powered (you pump it with your hands and then spray) rather than propellant powered since the one I had for years seems to have reached the end it its lifecycle, but I just haven't had the chance.
Meanwhile I've been using a silicon pastry brush to coat the pots and pans with canola or olive oil as needed. This has worked well most of the time but there are two problems with the non-cooking-spray technique:
- This doesn't work well when coating the hot, outdoor grill before barbequing your food (my husband, our chief BBQ-er has been complaining about there not being a can of cooking spray around)
- This doesn't work well when trying to add a thin layer of oil to food that is coated with flour or crumbs (the pastry brush takes off the flour or crumb mixture when it touches it)
I promised my husband I would purchase another can of cooking spray to tide us over until I locate a good re-usable oil sprayer (it's summer and BBQ season after all), and I found this new Smart Balance Omega nonstick cooking spray. A quick glance at the ingredient label told me that they use a combination of canola, soy and olive oils and a non-chlorofluorocarbon as the propellant.
The confusing part to a consumer might be the conflicting advertising banners on the label:
- Zero fat and calories
- Ideal ratio of omega-6 to omega-3
According to the nutrition information label, each second your finger is on the trigger of the cooking spray can, you are getting about 10 calories and 1.5 grams of total fat - .5 grams of which are polyunsaturated and .5 grams of which are monounsaturated. Okay, I know it's been a while since I was in a math class but I'm getting a total of 1 gram of fat (.5 + .5) when the total grams is 1.5. Where is the other .5 gram coming from? The label says 0 for saturated and trans fat. According to the company, this missing amount of fat is due to the rounding of numbers on the nutrition label.
As far as taste-testing purposes, this product performed very well!
My family is trying to generate less waste in general, so we are using the silicon brush more and the cooking spray can less. (I put it on the highest shelf in my kitchen cabinet so I really have to think about it before I grab it.) The other option is to buy a re-usable oil sprayer (Pampered Chef makes a pretty good one last I checked), buy a desirable oil (it could even be Smart Balance), and use it to to fill your sprayer!
Related Topics:
- The Recipe Doctor's Top 12 Healthy Cooking Gadgets
- Healthy Cooking with Elaine Magee, RD
- Healthy Cooking Newsletter - recipes, kitchen and shopping advice in your inbox
Labels: cooking green, environment, healthy diet, Taste Test Tuesday

