WebMD Blogs
Icon

Mad About Medicine

The good and the bad of all that is American Medicine

background

WebMD Health News

Wednesday, December 26, 2007

Doctors & Money: The Last Three Piggies
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Roast Beef, Bankruptcy, and Happiness

To round out our group of Piggies I thought that the last three sort of go together. These three Piggies may very well be at the center of how doctors are actually behaving and may give us all some insight into the future of how we will all get our healthcare in the coming years.

The Beef Eaters: Who really is the Piggy that had roast beef?

While much of the public tries to grasp onto the erroneous idea that all doctors do extraordinarily well financially this is clearly not the case. This I showed in the first Piggy that went to market. Read that. Twice. There are many doctors who do VERY well financially, though. We can define the financial winners (roast beef eaters) into three groups:
  1. The doctors that work their butts off 90 hours a week and run efficient offices.

  2. The doctors who are in specialties that are more involved in cosmetic aspects of medicine who built large factories of delivery of cosmetic care.

  3. The doctors who decided to remove themselves from all insurance plans and charge high rates for their services.
I am sure there are more groups but these represent the majority. Please feel free to blog on some more.

Let's look at these three groups not as much to make value judgments but to see if we can learn something from their effects on health care in general and our own health in particular.

I know many doctors who work very long hours, take a healthy number of health plans to assure diversity in their patient population and commitment to their community, charge reasonable rates for patients in plans they choose not to take and run the best offices they can. Take pictures of these doctors the next time you see them. Put them in the next space capsule so that future generations will know who they were. They are dead and but they don't know it yet. They will not be coming back. Count on seeing a Tyrannosaurus Rex before you see one of these dudes walking down the hall.

The cosmetic doctors and surgeons are neither doctors nor surgeons IF they are practicing their craft for the sake of vanity. Don't even try to convince me that they are doing anything good in the world concerning the self-image of those they operate on. That motivation affects less than 5% of plastic surgeons. The other 95% are hairdressers with licenses to hold scalpels instead of barber shears. They will make a lot of money (and eat a lot of roast beef) because we are a society consumed by youth and beauty. They are not surgeons. They just don't count when discussing medicine. End discussion. I laugh when I hear of a prominent Hollywood Plastic Surgeon. What a joke. Prominent for what? Saving lives - NOT. Helping the health of others - NOT. Making some already fathead actress have even puffier lips. If we define prominence based on that we are surely are on the road to perdition.

There is a third group that is more controversial and represents those most difficult aspects of the money crisis facing doctors. These are doctors who truly do outstanding medicine and surgery and decide to be out of all insurance plans and charge what they feel they should get for their services. This is difficult in that on the one hand I highly support their personal choices to charge what they want for their services. The problem is that, over time, only a select few in the population will be able to afford them. This means the truly best and the brightest will be treating rich people from Beverly Hills and Park Avenue and no one else.

Let's make this clear. The fault is not in the talented doctors that want to charge what they choose to but rather in that we do not have an insurance system that can even pay a pediatrician for a flu vaccine in a timely manner let alone complex brain surgery. This third group is the one that is growing most rapidly.

As general physicians, specialists and surgeons get more in demand it is only natural they will leave the insurance plans that offer below market pay, extra paperwork, and interference with decision making. This group will continue to grow and what will be left you will not want to operate on your worst enemy. It is already happening. If you are a patient in one of these large multi-medical groups that mixes primary care doctors and surgeons and you think that the surgeon in the group is the best one in the community then wake up. Of course not - it is the surgeon that the medical doctors hired to make money from. The better doctors went off to eat roast beef and you are the meat that is left for the surgeons in the multispecialty groups. This would be a good time to eat cake.

This brings us to our fourth Piggy: This Piggy Had None


In the war between insurers and insurers and insurers and more insurers with pharmaceutical and device manufacturers and politicians there will be casualties of this war. Patient health is one. For the purposes of this post the casualty will be good and well-meaning medical practices. They will not have roast beef. They will not even have liverwurst. They will have none. They will go bankrupt. They are the roadkill on the highway of health.

In the last five years alone I have seen countless 1-5 person medical groups close their doors for a variety of reasons. Some because they can't keep up with the expenses. Some because the paperwork and administrative time to practice is just not worth it. Others because the numbers don't add up after the 90th hour of work. Where did they go? Some joined multi-specialty groups for the "protection amongst the many" philosophy. I view this as temporary salvation as they are probably becoming medical refugees in large refugee camps until the insurance companies and politicians create havoc for these groups. Some have taken full-time salary positions for hospitals. This can be a great thing for a forward thinking hospital and a bonus to the physician but it does represent a change in the level of service and personalization. Others, if they are of a certain age, just decided to retire. The great sadness of the death of the smaller groups is that they were the backbone of service and dedication that made American medicine great. Without these groups we are becoming a bit more of an assembly line of medical practice.

So what will make doctors happy when it comes to payment and job dedication? Will we ever see the day when:

This Piggy cried wee, wee, wee all the way home.

Happiness is subjective. In this current medical environment represented by our five Piggies it is hard to determine what the mix should be. If money makes you happy then become a beef-eating plastic surgeon (medical beautician). If what you want is that amazing dedication type job but need to make more money and can't work 80 hours a week then you will surely stay home, work for a private equity firm, and cry wee, wee, wee for the rest of your days but you will not be a Dr. Piggy and the world will be without you as a talented Surgeon Piggy. If you are that good in medicine and charge a retail rate for your surgery you will be driving that great big car but all your patients will be industry fat cats. You will soon ask the question: Did I go into medicine to only treat the top 5% of the economic scale?

What will allow this Piggy to be happy and cry wee, wee, wee all the way home? From what I hear from my colleagues here are some of the major things that doctors would like to see happen in medicine:
  1. When a patient comes to the office for a service and that service gets rendered then the service gets paid. There are no denials by the insurance company for any of their classically lame reasons like- "we want more documentation," or "we are sending the bill for medical review."

  2. There absolutely needs to be serious reform of medical malpractice. I support caps on liability that have been in the State of Illinois for the past few years where the most a person can receive is 500K for an adult case and 1 million for a pediatric case. I also think there needs to be a state medical review that would allow a case to even go to a trial jury.

  3. If we ever do get to a universal insurance model there should be two options of participation: (a) complete joining by the doctor with payment of medical malpractice for those that accept the universal insurance and (b) joining partially where the doctor gets the universal payment but is allowed to charge any amount over that (no payment of this doctor's medical malpractice). This may assure a wide range of providers. Possibly.

  4. Allow doctors to partner with hospitals where hospitals can pick up certain costs like malpractice, office equipment and maybe even central scheduling or supplying of office workers. Currently these kinds of partnerships are illegal.

  5. Dismantle the entire private insurance industry. It is a failed model. Notice how I just sort of snuck that last one in...
It is unlikely that any of the above recommendations will even be remotely followed because generally speaking the free market will determine what happens. Smart Piggies will find out they will not get their value in medicine; they will seek other fields leaving a certain lesser-quality pool behind. That pool will be further diluted because the smartest Piggies left will go for the roast beef medical jobs and careers leaving whomever is left to be your and my doctor. That person will be our doctor for 3-5 years and then starve from the lack of any roast beef at all as they are the Piggies who had none. They will leave for other types of pastures. The few good souls who remain will not cry wee, wee, wee all the way home. They will just be crying during the eulogy service for the death of American medicine.

Oink.

Doctor K.

Related Topics:

Technorati Tags: , , , ,

Posted by: Ira Kirschenbaum, MD at 4:13 AM

Thursday, December 06, 2007

Medical School - This Little Piggy Stayed Home
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

In my last post we delved into the idea of payment of doctors. A touchy subject for some reason. It is still remarkable to me that everyone in this country can earn a market rate for their services but everyone wants to control doctor salaries. Let's move on.

Now that we live in an uber-regulated world of medicine what has this produced? Nothing particular good for patients. The insurance companies continue to rape the American public and the pharmaceutical companies and other companies assure themselves of profit.

How does a person decide what to do for a career? I think we all have gone through this in any field of endeavor. Here is a partial list of things someone considers when looking for a career:
  • Is it interesting to me?
  • Will I be good at it?
  • Am I helping people?
  • Will I actually get a job?
  • How much will I make?
  • What will my lifestyle be?

This and many other questions arise whether you want to be a nuclear physicist, small business owner, or a doctor.

What is the career that looks like this?
  • It is interesting to me
  • I know I will be good at it
  • I will definitely be helping people
  • I may not get a job (at least in the geographic area I want)
  • I will not make nearly as much as I could in other fields open to me
  • My lifestyle in this field is overworked and over-regulated by politicians and lawyers

The above career is actually medicine for a lot of people. Talented people who have choices put all these things into a hat and a decision is made. For many talented youth, medicine is not coming up on the radar.

There are numerous studies predicting the shortage of physicians that we will be beginning to experience within the next ten years. This has prompted certifying organizations like the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) to recommend increasing medical school spaces significantly. There are many studies and editorials as to whether this can practically be done. Issues related to the massive debt incurred by the cost of medical school with uncertainty of reimbursement in future years decrease the raw numbers of talented applicants. We are also seeing more students who went to off-shore medical schools or foreign-trained non-Americans who perceive the medical environment more favorable in this country than their own.

I am not completely sure whether these changes are good or bad. They may just be the factual state medicine and medical education that we will all need to adapt to. One can certainly argue that people who choose to go into medicine for the money may not be the doctors we want caring for us. Does this go against American nature, though? Money does seem to attract talent in many areas of the marketplace. On the other hand, a dedicated physician who has a reasonable balance of commitment and expectation of reasonable reimbursement would be a good model as well.

We will be running into problems though because there will certainly be many dedicated people who simply can't afford to go to medical school. The cost of medical education is so prohibitive (over $50,000/year) that a $200,000 debt upon leaving school is not possible for anyone except the children of the wealthy.

It seems that in this scenario, the Piggies will stay home. If you are in it for the money then medicine is not for you. If you are in it for the passion and to help mankind you are staying home unless you can afford to go.

I recall having a breakfast meeting with a dean of a major American medical school a short time ago and I asked him about the issue of funding for medical education. He told me that at his medical school (ranked in the top 15 in the nation), that 80% of the revenues came from government research grants, 10% from donations, and 10% medical school tuition. Then came from me the following obvious question- If only 10% of medical school revenue comes from tuition then why do you charge tuition at all? Why can't you make up the 10% in cost savings, more donations, or more grants? I told him to imagine the talent pool he would get by being a free medical school.

Here is the bottom line.

If we are going to force upon doctors regulations on how much they can earn with Universal Health Care and regulations restricting revenue from other sources it is clearly obvious that in exchange, medical education should be free and medical malpractice premiums should be paid by the insurers (government and private) and not the doctors. Then, and only then will we have a pure, dedicated talent pool to assure our health care for many generations and all the Piggies will not stay home from medical school.

~Dr. K.

Related Topics: Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by: Ira Kirschenbaum, MD at 1:18 PM

Thursday, September 20, 2007

Doctors and Money - This Little Piggy Goes to Market
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Photo by **Maurice**

Let's go to Market! What would happen to doctor payments if the free market was allowed to work? Let's begin.

A few postulates about the public:
  1. The public has absolutely no clue how much their own doctor gets paid
  2. The public has no clue how much the average doctor gets paid
  3. The public has no clue how much even the wealthiest doctors make.

A few postulates about doctors:
  1. Doctors have no clue how much the doctor across town is making ( or how much their patients make for their jobs)
  2. Doctors have no clue what their services are actually worth in a free market
  3. Doctors have no clue what their worth is as compared to other professions

But wait, there's more...
  1. The public thinks that doctors are grossly overpaid.
  2. Doctors think they are grossly underpaid.

Now let's look at cost:
  1. The public has no idea how much it costs to support and run a medical office
  2. The public has no idea of the cost of training a doctor
  3. The public has no idea of the amount of time their own doctor spends treating patients

Of course, the other side:
  1. Doctors are not the most savvy businessmen and have no idea how to efficiently run a service company
  2. Doctors think the world owes them forever for the financial and personal sacrifice they made to go to medical school
  3. Doctors think that they are entitled to a huge amount of money for every service they do with the patient.

I hope that at least some of the above completely annoys both patients and doctors. The patients reading this will be saying to themselves that I am wrong about the things I say about the public perceptions of doctors and the doctors will say I am totally on drugs (a charge often made on this site after one reads what I write. Some may even call me a traitor. I am none of those, but I'm not afraid to air the dirty laundry, either.)

The Experiment


If the public think doctors are pigs let's send the piggies to market and see what we are worth. BTW, I think pigs are pretty cute, very smart, and quite tasty.

At least the last time I looked, the United States was a free democracy that allowed capitalism to thrive. Every kid can grow up to be President, and that the free market rules in business. The law of supply and demand. The more people that want your service, the more you will get paid. If no one can afford your service, you will be forced to lower the price of your service. The free market. It actually works. It may explain why a majority of people in this country sleep in beds rather than caves.

To look carefully at this issue I devised the following thought experiment. I actually did real research for this article. I talked to other people. Colleagues, friends, and patients. This is how is all went.

Here are the assumptions I made:

I invented a sample practice based on real numbers after interviewing a number of colleagues in the practice of Orthopaedic Surgery. This model is based on Orthopaedic Surgery because it is the world I know. I kind of like to write on something I at least know something about. The conclusions drawn from this informal study probably applies to all medical practices, but you make your own decision on that.

Based on real information this is what our "WebMD - Get a Medical Life" practice looks like:

  1. The practice has three surgeons
  2. The gross revenue collected from patient fees is 3.6 million dollars
  3. The overhead of the practice which includes everything except salaries is 60% of revenue (believe me this is a real number!). In actual dollars for our thought experiment this is 2.16 million dollars
  4. Each doctor works an average of 70 hours a week, not including being available for phone calls or visits to the emergency room on off-hours every other day = another real number.
  5. The practice is in a community where there is a normal mix of insurance companies and Medicare.
  6. The practice is on the panel of every insurance company that exists in their area. This goes by other common terms: The doctor accepts the patient's insurance, the doctor is par with the insurance... I think you get it.
  7. Each surgeon in this busy practice sees an average of 4,000 office visits a year. This is a lot of visits. Needless to say, they probably don't spend a ton of time with each patient.
  8. The practice philosophy is based on excellent surgery, commitment to proper diagnosis and treatment, and making money, which is why this group chooses to work longer hours and see more patients.
  9. The group is a respected group in its community from the point of view of patient satisfaction and the perception that if you need surgery this is a group to have it with. A "Go To" group.
  10. In the town next to this group is a group from a prestigious university clinic that chooses to accept no insurance. They charge what they consider the rates they feel they are deserved. For the purposes of this thought experiment, assume that the quality of the surgery and the diagnosis and treatment as compared to our hypothetical practice are completely equal.
  11. One major procedure that this group does is a hip replacement. They do a full range of Orthopaedic procedures, though.
  12. The surgeon you go to is Dr. SmithJones. You are going for a hip replacement.

Here is the experiment -- a survey which I want all of you to take. Answer the questions in order. At the end of the question group are the real answers and then we let the sparks fly.

Questions:


  1. How much to you think Dr. SmithJones receives from Medicare/HMO to perform a total hip replacement? This fee includes the pre-operative evaluation and ninety (90) days of post-operative care rolled into a single fee.
  2. Dr. SmithJones has another surgeon there as a first assistant (assume this is a required and important role). How much does the assistant surgeon, Dr. Surgical Assistant, receive to assist a total hip replacement?
  3. Dr. SmithJones has an assistant, Dr. Patient Assistant, who shares in daily visits to the patients every other day. How much does Dr. Patient Assistant receive for this service each time he visits the patient?


(Theme from Jeopardy... Da da da da da da da, da da da da DA da da da da da, da da da da da da da, da da da da da da da.)

Write your answers on a paper. No cheating, now!

Here are the results of my straw poll when I asked a bunch of people the answers to this question. See if your answers compare to what the people I asked told me what they thought. Compare what you wrote to what people I asked told me. They probably are quite similar.

  1. In answer to the question: How much do you think Dr. SmithJones actually receives for the surgery? One person came in with the lowest number at $3,000.00. The next lowest was $5,000.00. The majority had numbers ranging from $8,000.00 to $12,000.00.
  2. In answer to the question: How much do you think Dr. Surgical Assistant receives for assisting in the surgery? The numbers ranged from $500.00 to $2,000.00
  3. In answer to the question: How much do you think Dr. Patient Assistant gets for seeing the patient in the hospital after the surgery (per day/per visit). The numbers ranged from $50.00 to $150.00.

Okay. Now answer the following multiple choice questions.

I will give you an answer (not necessarily the real answer) to the above questions. You answer each with one of the following choices:
  1. That amount is too little
  2. That amount is too much
  3. That amount is just right

Answer the following three questions:
  1. Dr. SmithJones received $3,000.00 from Medicare/HMOs to perform a total hip replacement. This fee includes the pre-operative evaluation and ninety (90) days of post-operative care rolled into a single fee.
    1. That amount is too little
    2. That amount is too much
    3. That amount is just right

  2. 2. Dr. Surgical Assistant receives $500.00 to assist in the hip replacement surgery.
    1. That amount is too little
    2. That amount is too much
    3. That amount is just right

  3. Dr. Patient Assistant receives $50.00 for each day he visits the patient in the hospital after surgery.
    1. That amount is too little
    2. That amount is too much
    3. That amount is just right

Write your answers down. I will give you some time.

Da da da da da da da, da da da da DA da da da da da, da da da da da da da, da da da da da da da. Repeat once. Extra credit fill-in: I am singing the ??????? Theme?

Based on what you wrote and what I supplied you from my survey, you have an idea of not only what the public perceives what Dr. SmithJones gets for the hip replacement but also, based on the lowest amount mentioned on the first survey you learned whether you thought this was too low, high, or just right. Pretty good information. Remember, this is the free market in action.

One last question and then we put it all together.

Make the following assumption: There is some type of insurance plan that pays 100% for the hospital, hospital physicians like anesthesiologists and pathologists, equipment, blood transfusions and all other institutional type services (often as high as $25,000.00). You, therefore, pay none of these pills under the DRK Universal Health Plan (DRK- Doctor K). You are, though, responsible to pay only for the doctor's fee (like you may pay for a plumber, for example).

Answer the following questions:
  1. I need to pay Dr. SmithJones $3,000.00 for the hip replacement. I can pay in a single payment or over a one-year period at 0% interest. This would work out to $250.00/month for 12 months. The payments are fully tax-deductible.
    1. I think this is fair and reasonable and I would pay this.
    2. I think this is too high for this service.
  2. I need to pay Dr. Surgical Assistant $500.00 for his role in assisting Dr. SmithJones for the hip replacement. I can pay this in a single payment or over a one year period at 0% interest. This would work out to $41.67/month for 12 months. The payments are fully tax-deductible.
    1. I think this is fair and reasonable and I would pay this.
    2. I think this is too high for this service.
  3. I need to pay Dr. Patient Assistant $150.00 ($50.00/day for three days) for his role in seeing me in the hospital after the surgery. I can pay this in a single payment or over a one year period at 0% interest This would work out to $12.50/month for 12 months. The payments are fully tax-deductible.
    1. I think this is fair and reasonable and I would pay this.
    2. I think this is too high for this service.

When I conducted the survey, a near 100% answered section 2 either that the made up numbers (for example $3000.00 for the hip replacement) was either "Just Right" or "Low." No one thought the amount was too much. Needless to say, considering one does not get a hip replacement often, the yearly pay-off of this reasonable fee seemed to all an interesting and realistic idea.

What are the real numbers?


Doctor Procedure Minimum - Acceptable Free-Market Fee - Actual reimbursement

  • Dr. SmithJones Total Hip Replacement $3000.00 - $1347.86 - 42%
  • Dr. Surgical Assistant Assisting Surgery 500.00 - $183.31 - 37%
  • Dr. Patient Assistant 3 days of post-op visits $150.00 - $00.00 - 0%

The current reimbursement going to this group of 3 surgeons is severely and artificially depressed as compared to lowest the free market would accept to pay. Based on the lowest the public would be willing to pay a doctor for services, doctors are receiving less than 50%.

What happened to the free market?


After all, there are few industries in which people choose to work where the salaries are artificially depressed to below-market rates.

Keep in mind that doctors are not a single group of workers. Each doctor or doctor group is an independent business so medicine as an industry cannot be viewed as though the doctors are employed by others. If that was the case, then doctors would legally be allowed to unionize and act in concert in negotiations with insurance companies. Currently, even this is illegal.

It is illegal for physicians to collectively bargain or organize as any single group because the government views them as separate businesses organizing to influence the market and this is considered against antitrust statutes. It is amazing that the government uses one law that tries to assure free trade and protect a fair market while the same law actually prevents competition with the insurance companies and inhibits the free market!

The artificial depression and selective destruction of free markets in medicine continues in medical programs like Medicare. Many patients are unaware of the gross inconsistency of Medicare regulations as compared with regulations in other industries. For example, if a physician chooses to be part of the Medicare program, that physician cannot charge higher than allowable Medicare rates. That, of course, I believe, is fair. If you choose to be part of a program then you need to accept the provisions.

Did you know, though, that if a physician chooses NOT to be part of the Medicare program, the physician is legally not allowed to charge the more than the allowable Medicare rate? This means that when Bill Gates turns 65 and has Medicare for insurance the doctor can only charge him 15% above the allowable $33.10 for that follow-up visit for his high blood pressure visit.

When did we give the government permission to dictate the amount of money a person in private business is allowed to charge? Are there national dry cleaner rates for people over 65? Are there national designer clothing rates that a department store must charge? The only industry I know of that does anything close to this are gas and electric utilities.

Medicine is not a public utility -- yet. Whether it becomes one is neither the issue nor scope of this entry. This issue is that in when physicians pay vendors for services such as supplies and employee wages, they live in the free market. When it comes to reimbursement, current government programs coupled with the inconsistent regulation of the industry prevents doctors from living in a free market.

Here's what a true free market would be like: Dr. SmithJones would earn anywhere from twice to six times what he currently earns. The reason for the large range is because if the reimbursement will be increased and expenses will remain fixed.

Once Dr. SmithJones starts getting paid even the lowest market rate he will probably stop trying to squeeze in 100 patients a day in the office, spend more time with each patient. This will lower the raw number of patients he sees and possibly improve patient satisfaction and treatment which is yet another benefit of following the free market.

Is the fair-market price too high or too low?


Wrong question. This is the real life answer representing the free market for services rendered. The free market does not lie. The free market is not emotional. Is $25,000 too high or too low for a new car? Also wrong question - the cost is based on the free market. The rest of the country functions on free market principles; your business probably does as well. Pharmaceutical companies and insurance certainly do. If the doctor went to market, the numbers presented show what he would get.

Health care in the United States is reimbursed at below-bargain basement rates. In businesses in this country where you pay bargain basement prices you get bargain basement quality and service. It is only through the ethical nature and dedication of a majority of doctors in this country, who choose to practice blind to the reimbursement and treat individual patients equally and fairly, that this does not happen and medical delivery remains of the highest quality.

Unlike a piggy going to market, doctors are lambs to the slaughter of the business and political agendas at work in this country.

I will see you later; I have an errand to run. I am definitely going to the market...how about you?

QED

Next installment: This Piggy Stayed Home- What happens to the future of health care when the best and the brightest choose not to go into health care but into corporate Wall Street type jobs?

Related Topics:

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by: Ira Kirschenbaum, MD at 3:15 AM

Wednesday, September 19, 2007

Doctors, Money, Salaries, and Similar Unspoken Topics
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

This little piggy went to market.
This little piggy stayed home.
This little piggy had roast beef.
This little piggy had none.
This little piggy cried "Wee! Wee! Wee!" all the way home.

I sat here listening to the Fourth movement of Beethoven's 9th Symphony in attempt to see if I can muster the energy to even start this highly charged topic. It didn't help but the music is great anyway. Probably more inspiration from Eminem on the topic of doctors and money..

There is probably no topic I know of that brings more spirited discussion than the payment of doctors. I tried to figure this out. It seems, first of all that insurance companies are really not people, they are nameless and faceless companies. At least a doctor is someone you can actually touch (even though we are God-like :-))

I know no better way to understand the complex economics of doctor reimbursement than the statistically significant analysis using the above nursery rhyme.

This is the first blog entry in the series The Piggy and Medical Reimbursement. The five parts are:

  1. This Piggy Went to Market: What doctors would make of market forces-determined doctor payment

  2. This Piggy Stayed Home: The consequences to medicine when talented men and women choose not to go into medicine due to financial and lifestyle problems in the profession.

  3. This Piggy Had Roast Beef: The private world of high-priced fee-for service medicine with "doctors to the stars" and others who charge huge fees for even the simplest procedure.

  4. This Piggy Had None: The problems of practices going out of business or being forced to join large impersonal medical groups that supply cookbook medicine because they economically can't make it in this environment or simply leave a town leaving it without medical care.

  5. This Piggy Cried "Wee! Wee! Wee!" All the Way Home: Recommendations for a health care payment system that properly rewards doctors for doing the right thing for patients that makes us all happy.


Related Topics:

Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by: Ira Kirschenbaum, MD at 11:57 PM

Friday, August 31, 2007

The One-Paragraph First Step to Solving the Health Care Crisis
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Health care is a mess because the insurance companies are interfering with the clinical decision-making process. They have so many rules so that they do not pay in that they deny many legitimate claims over and over again. It should be the law of the land that to be allowed the privilege of offering insurance in the country, all insurers, HMOs, PPOs, etc. must have the same rules and regulations concerning payment and clinical decision making as the Medicare system. If they would like to offer a more robust coverage product on top of that foundation, they can do so but no added benefit can in any way change any aspect of the basic Medicare benefits structure.

In other words, the first step should be to standardize claims review and criteria, based on current Medicare standards. What's the next one?

Related Topics:
Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by: Ira Kirschenbaum, MD at 1:43 PM

Thursday, August 23, 2007

CEO Compensation: Who Said Health Care is in a Financial Crisis?
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Those of you who are struggling to pay for your generic medicines or wondering why the doctor is charging you a $5.00 co-pay, give some thought to these facts about how our health care dollars are allocated. At the end of this post, there is a list of 23 health companies I found on Forbes.com, what the CEO was paid in 2005, and the average paid to the CEO in the past five years.

Imagine adding vice presidents, Board of Directors, stock holders and the other 200-300 other companies all cashing in on your health to that total at the bottom.

Based on this, the next time you want to argue with your Primary Care doctor's front desk about a $5.00 co-pay, remember that he makes an average of $149,000.00 per year. On the other hand -- using United Healthcare as an example -- your insurance company paid their CEO -- one man -- $324,000,000 over a recent five year period.

If you are uninsured, try calling any one of these 23 CEOs and see if they will give you free insurance.

BTW: 10% of 14.9 billion is 1.4 billion. If basic insurance costs $8,000/year for a family then taking 10% from just these CEO salaries would insure 35,000 Americans a year for five years. That is a lot of people that can be helped just by 23 men. Looking at the companies as a whole that profit from health care, we can probably pay for every uninsured person in this country for decades to come.

The numbers are numbing, which is why we should do something about this.

  • United Health Group
    CEO: William W McGuire
    2005: 124.8 mil
    5-year: 342 mil

  • Forest Labs
    CEO: Howard Solomon
    2005: 92.1 mil
    5-year: 295 mil

  • Caremark Rx
    CEO: Edwin M Crawford
    2005: 77.9 mil
    5-year: 93.6 mil

  • Abbott Lab
    CEO: Miles White
    2005: 26.2 mil
    5-year: 25.8 mil

  • Aetna
    CEO: John Rowe
    2005: 22.1 mil
    5-year:57.8 mil

  • Amgen
    CEO: Kevin Sharer
    2005:5.7 mil
    5-year:59.5 mil

  • Bectin-Dickinson
    CEO: Edwin Ludwig
    2005: 10 mil
    5-year:18 mil

  • Boston Scientific
    CEO:
    2005:38.1 mil
    5-year:45 mil

  • Cardinal Health
    CEO: James Tobin
    2005:1.1 mil
    5-year:33.5 mil

  • Cigna
    CEO: H. Edward Hanway
    2005:13.3 mil
    5-year:62.8 mil

  • Genzyme
    CEO: Henri Termeer
    2005: 19 mil
    5-year:60.7 mil

  • Humana
    CEO: Michael McAllister
    2005:2.3 mil
    5-year:12.9 mil

  • Johnson & Johnson
    CEO: William Weldon
    2005:6.1 mil
    5-year:19.7 mil

  • Laboratory Corp America
    CEO: Thomas MacMahon
    2005:7.9 mil
    5-year:41.8 mil

  • Eli Lilly
    CEO: Sidney Taurel
    2005:7.2 mil
    5-year:37.9 mil

  • McKesson
    CEO: John Hammergen
    2005: 13.4 mil
    5-year:31.2 mil

  • Medtronic
    CEO: Arthur Collins
    2005: 4.7 mil
    5-year:39 mil

  • Merck Raymond Gilmartin
    CEO:
    2005: 37.8 mil
    5-year:49.6 mil

  • PacifiCare Health
    CEO: Howard Phanstiel
    2005: 3.4 mil
    5-year: 8.5 mil

  • Pfizer
    CEO: Henry McKinnell
    2005: 14 mil
    5-year: 74 mil

  • Well Choice
    CEO: Michael Stocker
    2005: 3.2 mil
    5-year: 10.7 mil

  • WellPoint
    CEO: Larry Glasscock
    2005: 23 mil
    5-year: 46.8 mil

  • Wyeth
    CEO: Robert Essner
    2005:6.5 mil
    5-year: 28.9 mil

TOTAL 2005: 559.8 mil

TOTAL 5-Year: 14.9 billion


Related Topics: Technorati Tags: , , ,

The opinions expressed in the WebMD Blogs are of the author and the author alone. WebMD does not endorse any specific product, service, treatment or political point of view.

Posted by: Ira Kirschenbaum, MD at 3:45 PM

Monday, July 30, 2007

Health Insurance: SiCKO Has the Right Idea
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

I had the chance to see Michael Moore's new documentary: SiCKO. I did not read any reviews before going in and did not go on his website before seeing the movie.

See this movie.

Getting an education in the mess we call health care is more complex than a degree in astrophysics from MIT but we all have to get it and we have to start somewhere. Whether you agree with Moore or not, see the movie. He is right about the one thing that a vast majority of readers of this blog were right about: The insurance companies are THE MAJOR reason we are in the mess we are in.

Since the movie came out there are a number of critics out there who have been trying to bring up all the accessory problems that health care has. Many, if not all of these are true. The problem is that whenever someone waters the arguments down with a claim about the quality of hospitals, the amount of money paid to hospitals and doctors, the grading of performance, the useless tests ordered, or medical malpractice is a problem one fact always will emerge. No problem in health care can be fixed without first a massive restructuring of the system with which we pay - the insurance system.

OK. We now know the problems. What are we going to do? It is about time the biggest lobby in the country - the American People - got it together to put an end to the insurance abuses. If you have been under a rock for the last 30 years here is what happens:

  1. Insurance companies take your monthly premium payment. If you do not pay immediately, you are quickly canceled.
  2. Insurance companies decide on the premium based on the profit they want to obtain.
  3. Any profits from the system go to executives and shareholders and not back into health care.
  4. Insurance companies routinely and arbitrarily deny approval for necessary tests for patients.
  5. Insurance companies routinely and artificially deny payments to doctors and hospitals for services already approved and performed.
  6. Insurance companies have the goal to NOT PAY a claim.
  7. Insurance companies interfere with clinical decision making of physicians.
  8. Insurance companies have lobbyists that have heavily influence your Congressman and Senator.
  9. Insurance companies have no interest in "maintaining" your health. HMO's are designed for profit even when they call themselves non-profit.
  10. Insurance companies abide by their own rules of behavior.

There is really only one solution. Reform the health insurance industry as we know it. Make it illegal to sell health insurance in America until every American is covered with a basic universal plan and then, and only then, insurance companies can sell gap-type insurance.

Here is the bottom line. There are a ton of real problems in health care. If you want to get a good idea of some of the issues I recommend you read the book Better by Atul Gawande. It is an excellent balanced view of how we can hope to improve American health care.

In the meantime, while we are looking for balanced solutions get your Congressman, Senator, or Presidential Hopeful to outline a plan for meaningful regulatory controls over the insurance industry and start working on a fair and open universal health care system that covers all Americans, allows doctors to opt out, but assures an acceptable quality of care for every citizen.

Doctor K

Related Topics: Technorati Tags: , , ,

Posted by: Ira Kirschenbaum, MD at 1:19 PM

background