We take it for granted, the ornate front steps and tasteful stride down into the kitchen or living room. The kids are upstairs calling out for help on their homework and can we have dinner, down the steep stairs, out onto the uneven lawn?
This is a common scene of the great American family at day’s end. Mom and Dad sip a drink, too content to be mindful of a large and growing segment of the population that is shut away from that idyllic life.
Think about the logistics: These individuals are the disabled. Even if they could find and win jobs to support an attractive lifestyle, the work would likely be low-paying. The unemployment among the disabled runs at about 75 percent. Transportation for those who can’t afford specially fitted vehicles is out of reach. A shocking number of the disabled are locked away in nursing homes, though government could probably spend less money locating affordable housing, decent jobs, and assisting with transportation to assist people with special needs.
The leaders of the independent living movement often operate from wheelchairs. They bring passion to their cause and know the ins and outs of the bureaucratic documents, such as the Americans with Disabilities Act. Most would agree that their biggest hurdle is a condescending or ignorant public that does not give a damn.
Americans see the disabled, physically and mentally, as half people. Then there are the myths: ‘the disabled lead tragic lives and deserve our pity’ myth; ‘the disabilities define people’ myth; ‘the disabled are sick and in endless pain’ myth; ‘the disabled are special and deserve special treatment’ myth. These are all wrong and stupid. The myths are nothing more than a guaranteed formula for never changing the system.
The independence movement is cross-disability. You will see as many white canes and dogs as wheel chairs. These people, as they are known with good, old-fashioned condescension are victims of quiet discrimination. So are the chronically ill. The chronically healthy do not want to deal with any of us. Leaders of the independent living movement find that discrimination comes at them even from the medical community. A little too freakish. Too much paper work. Too many special needs. I would have expected much more from our doctors.
One alternative to independent living commonly accepted by a healthy public is assisted living, which many in the disability world consider segregated and second-rate. Many call it glorified nursing-home care. There are many unhappy people whom god did not seem to smile upon in the first place.
And the healthy are continuing the trend, which I would label again as genuine discrimination. You do not need race, religion, or gender to make discrimination a powerful issue. The sick and disabled seem to have a soft voice, difficult to hear over life’s din, unless people are listening which apparently, they are not.
Americans do not seem to know or care much about the living conditions of the sick and disabled. Are you sympathetic to the sick and disabled who desperately seek independence? If not, why not? Add your comments to this Discussion on the Chronic Disease & Disability Exchange.