WebMD Blogs
Icon

TV Checkup

We're obsessed with television. As employees of America's number one health site, we often find ourselves questioning the medicine behind our favorite medical TV shows. Do the docs on ER and House really know their stuff? And just how common is that rare disease on last night's Grey's Anatomy?

background

WebMD Health News

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

HOUSE: Sabotaged by Striking Writers?
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

Okay, perhaps I have nitpicked a bit too much about this medical drama in the past. All too often House plays it very loose with authentic medical knowledge, unlike the more accurate stories portrayed in competing dramas like ER.

Believe me, any previous criticism was nothing. This time I'm really going to pick some major 'nit'!

As you know, the 2007-08 TV season was interrupted by the writers' strike. Production companies cannot shoot new episodes without scripts. The regular season of House was halted at the end of November (sweeps month, very convenient) and Fox has relied on reruns during the interim. Fortunately there were a few unaired episodes 'in the can' so they have been dusted off as we head into the February ratings book.

It is my suspicion that screenwriters for House went out of their way to poison their last few pre-strike scripts with medical nonsense. Episode 80, It's A Wonderful Life, supports this theory. The story takes place on Christmas Eve because it was supposed to air in December. Viewers have to get past that disconnect, but if you really like this show it is a benign distraction.

Bring on the nit!

A single mom experiences paralysis in both limbs, bleeding problems, swollen lymph nodes, and sudden loss of vision in both eyes. She also developed rock-hard bones due to impaired calcium metabolism. Aha! This must be some type of paraneoplastic syndrome. Paraneoplasia is an abnormal tissue response to cancer elsewhere in the body. The storyline drags the viewers through all kinds of diagnostic possibilities but, sure enough, my hunch was eventually confirmed.

The neurologic problems, the blindness, the loss of platelets, even the bone hardening can be linked to the presence of cancer cell proteins (onconeural antigens) that triggered hostile immune responses in these target tissues.

The viewer learns that the patient underwent elective mastectomies years earlier because she carried a high-risk breast cancer gene. Lo and behold, the patient still developed breast cancer and that was the cause of the paraneoplastic syndrome.

How can a woman develop breast cancer without breasts? It's simple, she had ectopic breast tissue elsewhere in her body...a clump of normal breast tissue where it doesn't belong. In this case it was situated in her thigh.

This misplaced tissue phenomenon (tissue heterotopia) is a developmental error that happens all the time. Little wisps of thyroid gland can end up far from the neck. I've seen patients with tear-producing lacrimal gland tissue located inside the eyeball.

Now, get ready, it's time to excavate that nit!

Once the mystery is solved House instructs his team to schedule excision of the cancerous growth and start breast cancer chemotherapy, "...and all of her other problems will go away". Wrong, very wrong.

Among the diagnostic criteria for paraneoplastic disease:
  • The paraneoplastic process itself is noncancerous

  • The paraneoplastic process is anatomically remote from the cancer, and

  • The clinical course of the paraneoplasia is independent of any cancer treatment.

Sadly, even if the patient responded completely to her anti-cancer therapy, the paraneoplastic consequences (paralysis, bleeding, blindness, etc.) would persist.

I suspect that such an egregious flaw in storytelling would not have occurred in the hands of happy, satisfied screenwriters. Is there such a thing as Writer's Malpractice?

Related Topics: Technorati Tags: , , , , ,

Posted by: Dr. Lloyd at 1/30/2008 01:08:00 AM

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Please remember, IT'S JUST A STORY!!!Besides, when a character we loved so well on WEST WING has such a horrible disease, everyone WANTS a happy ending. Does anyone really believe the stuff they tell us on TV dramas? Did anyone think Star Trek was real science? Did it make a difference?

2/01/2008 7:24 PM  
Blogger Jennifer said...

I enjoy reading the facts behind the TV medicine. While this one has a mocking tone (unlike original blogs from this site, which were mostly informative), at least it's SOMETHING.

This is tons better than comments on The Biggest Loser, Project Runway or Kid Nation. For some reason, bloggers from this site ignored the last episodes of Grey's Anatomy, Scrubs, current eps. of Nip/Tuck and whatever else in order to do regular TV commentary on reality shows.

I still have this blog on my feed list in hopes of a return to the original style - medical information about procedures seen on tv and how factual (or not) they are - sometimes even more information about the condition itself.
Unfortunately, for the most part, this has turned into a television commentary blog. Really- if I want that type of information, I'll visit TV Guide's blogs, TVSquad, Give Me My Remote, or others.

2/04/2008 7:19 AM  

Post a Comment

background