So You Want to Leave Your Period Behind?
Remember the passage in The Diary of Anne Frank where she talks about the excitement and "sweet secret" of getting her first period? Perhaps many of us felt some excitement, a rite of passage into the world of women, when first visited by "Aunt Flo." But with passing years the perceptions of menstruation might be less kindly. "The Curse" with its pads/tampons/cramps and various inconveniences was not a welcome visitor anymore - unless one was concerned about an unintended pregnancy.
For an excellent read about the cultural history of menstruation I highly recommend that you check out a copy of Delaney, Lupton, and Toth's entertaining discourse The Curse: A Cultural History of Menstruation, first published in 1976. Within that book one can visit "Menstrual Images in Literature," "Menstrual Taboos" and other fascinating topics from a feminist viewpoint.
At the time of the most recent edition of that book (1988), DepoProvera was not yet approved for use in the USA (that happened in October 1992), and all birth control pills were packaged with seven days of milk sugar or iron placebo pills. Women were routinely instructed to start their birth control pills (BCPs) on the first Sunday after the beginning of menses. This would ensure that most women would not be on their "pill periods" during a weekend. More progressive GYNs were suggesting starting BCPs on the first day of flow to decrease the need of a back up method. A few GYNs were advising patients to take only the active pills to try and avoid a scheduled bleed. Usually, this method of pill taking was reserved for medical indications such as menstrual migraines, severe premenstrual symptoms, or endometriosis.
Things have certainly changed. In May of 2007 the Food and Drug Administration approved Lybrel, the first birth control pill approved to be used without any placebo pills. This was the final step that followed the introduction of four days of placebo pills (Yaz), and a week of placebo pills only every third month (Seasonale). What are the pluses or minuses around trying to eliminate menstrual periods? Let's look at things you might want to consider.
"No Period on the Pill" is not the same as "Missed Periods on Your Own"
In a normal menstrual month, estrogen is produced all month long, and the majority of progesterone is produced in the two weeks after ovulation. If your uterine lining could be considered as your grass or lawn—then estrogen is like fertilizer (it stimulates the lining to grow thicker). In this analogy, progesterone is like the lawn mower—it prevents the grass from getting too thick and tall. When progesterone leaves the scene (ie conception does not occur with that ovulation), the grass clippings are dumped—your menstrual flow.
DepoProvera ("the shot") is a very large dose of synthetic progesterone. This is like having heavy duty lawnmower activity everyday. That's why DepoProvera for birth control can prompt women to not have periods. There is not that much lining to shed. All birth control pills (BCPs) contain synthetic progesterone. This is why most women on BCPs will have shorter, lighter periods. Even BCP users can develop such a thin uterine lining that their periods will disappear. So for a woman using hormonal forms of birth control (even the progesterone containing IUD) menstruation can disappear as the uterine lining becomes thin. Generally speaking a thin uterine lining is a good thing. It decreases the risk of the most common form of uterine cancer. Once the hormonal contribution of the birth control is out of the woman's body her original menstruation pattern will return.
By contrast, when a woman misses a period(s), and she is not taking hormonal forms of birth control, that can result in health problems. The most common reason for not having a period (once pregnancy is ruled out) is missed ovulations. In this instance, the uterine lining grows very thick from continued estrogen effects. Without the lawn mower effects of progesterone the lining becomes very thick. When the lining begins to shed, the bleeding can be very heavy and/or prolonged. An overly thickened lining provides a setting for abnormal cells to arise. These can set the stage for cancer of the uterine lining.
What Happens When Continuous Birth Control Pills Are Taken?
Remember in most birth control pills (BCPs) there is both synthetic estrogen and progesterone in each active pill. So everyday the uterine lining gets some fertilizer effects and some lawn mowing effects. During the placebo week of a pill pack, the blood levels of synthetic estrogen and progesterone fall. This causes the lining of the uterus to become destabilized and shed. When pills/patch/ring are used continuously a thick lining is NOT being created, or retained, inside the uterus. If there is no week when the hormones are withdrawn, there is no regular "pill period" ("hormone withdrawal bleed").
In the ideal world this would mean that there is no bleeding until the medication is stopped. However, as many women know from experience, breakthrough bleeding and unscheduled spotting can be common among users of pill/patch/shot/vaginal ring forms of birth control. This is one of the greatest possible drawbacks to "continuous" or "long cycle" regimens of BCPs. In the initial studies on Lybrel, only one third of participants had no bleeding or spotting after about a year's use.
So What Are the Downsides - If Any?
As discussed above, having to deal with some breakthrough bleeding or spotting is a real possibility. Absent menstrual periods can be a big advantage, but if one is worried about an undetected pregnancy, theoretically a woman could be spending more on pregnancy tests. For women who experience decreased sex drive on hormonal birth control (due to loss of pre-ovulatory testosterone, and lower free testosterone levels) increased pill usage would likely not improve the problem. Finally, there is no long term data on using BCPs continuously. With intensive scrutiny for almost fifty years, the largest studies have not suggested a link between BCP use and development of breast cancer.
For some women there is a strong symbolic link between regular menstruation and their concept of femininity. There is a subculture of menstrual rituals including the use of washable menstrual pads, then using the soaking water to water plants. The loss of the cyclic rituals, shared or private, might be mourned with the absence of regular flows.
Am I a Good Candidate to Try and Eliminate My Periods?
Only your own GYN or clinic can give you a conclusive answer. Yet, if you are a successful and satisfied user of hormonal forms of birth control you could easily try an extended use regimen. Your own GYN can discuss the various options such as the FDA approved Lybrel or even using your current method without a hormone free week. Whatever you try, just remember you can always decide to bail out and try something else.
Related Topics: Technorati Tags: birth control, no period, womens health
For an excellent read about the cultural history of menstruation I highly recommend that you check out a copy of Delaney, Lupton, and Toth's entertaining discourse The Curse: A Cultural History of Menstruation, first published in 1976. Within that book one can visit "Menstrual Images in Literature," "Menstrual Taboos" and other fascinating topics from a feminist viewpoint.
At the time of the most recent edition of that book (1988), DepoProvera was not yet approved for use in the USA (that happened in October 1992), and all birth control pills were packaged with seven days of milk sugar or iron placebo pills. Women were routinely instructed to start their birth control pills (BCPs) on the first Sunday after the beginning of menses. This would ensure that most women would not be on their "pill periods" during a weekend. More progressive GYNs were suggesting starting BCPs on the first day of flow to decrease the need of a back up method. A few GYNs were advising patients to take only the active pills to try and avoid a scheduled bleed. Usually, this method of pill taking was reserved for medical indications such as menstrual migraines, severe premenstrual symptoms, or endometriosis.
Things have certainly changed. In May of 2007 the Food and Drug Administration approved Lybrel, the first birth control pill approved to be used without any placebo pills. This was the final step that followed the introduction of four days of placebo pills (Yaz), and a week of placebo pills only every third month (Seasonale). What are the pluses or minuses around trying to eliminate menstrual periods? Let's look at things you might want to consider.
"No Period on the Pill" is not the same as "Missed Periods on Your Own"
In a normal menstrual month, estrogen is produced all month long, and the majority of progesterone is produced in the two weeks after ovulation. If your uterine lining could be considered as your grass or lawn—then estrogen is like fertilizer (it stimulates the lining to grow thicker). In this analogy, progesterone is like the lawn mower—it prevents the grass from getting too thick and tall. When progesterone leaves the scene (ie conception does not occur with that ovulation), the grass clippings are dumped—your menstrual flow.
DepoProvera ("the shot") is a very large dose of synthetic progesterone. This is like having heavy duty lawnmower activity everyday. That's why DepoProvera for birth control can prompt women to not have periods. There is not that much lining to shed. All birth control pills (BCPs) contain synthetic progesterone. This is why most women on BCPs will have shorter, lighter periods. Even BCP users can develop such a thin uterine lining that their periods will disappear. So for a woman using hormonal forms of birth control (even the progesterone containing IUD) menstruation can disappear as the uterine lining becomes thin. Generally speaking a thin uterine lining is a good thing. It decreases the risk of the most common form of uterine cancer. Once the hormonal contribution of the birth control is out of the woman's body her original menstruation pattern will return.
By contrast, when a woman misses a period(s), and she is not taking hormonal forms of birth control, that can result in health problems. The most common reason for not having a period (once pregnancy is ruled out) is missed ovulations. In this instance, the uterine lining grows very thick from continued estrogen effects. Without the lawn mower effects of progesterone the lining becomes very thick. When the lining begins to shed, the bleeding can be very heavy and/or prolonged. An overly thickened lining provides a setting for abnormal cells to arise. These can set the stage for cancer of the uterine lining.
What Happens When Continuous Birth Control Pills Are Taken?
Remember in most birth control pills (BCPs) there is both synthetic estrogen and progesterone in each active pill. So everyday the uterine lining gets some fertilizer effects and some lawn mowing effects. During the placebo week of a pill pack, the blood levels of synthetic estrogen and progesterone fall. This causes the lining of the uterus to become destabilized and shed. When pills/patch/ring are used continuously a thick lining is NOT being created, or retained, inside the uterus. If there is no week when the hormones are withdrawn, there is no regular "pill period" ("hormone withdrawal bleed").
In the ideal world this would mean that there is no bleeding until the medication is stopped. However, as many women know from experience, breakthrough bleeding and unscheduled spotting can be common among users of pill/patch/shot/vaginal ring forms of birth control. This is one of the greatest possible drawbacks to "continuous" or "long cycle" regimens of BCPs. In the initial studies on Lybrel, only one third of participants had no bleeding or spotting after about a year's use.
So What Are the Downsides - If Any?
As discussed above, having to deal with some breakthrough bleeding or spotting is a real possibility. Absent menstrual periods can be a big advantage, but if one is worried about an undetected pregnancy, theoretically a woman could be spending more on pregnancy tests. For women who experience decreased sex drive on hormonal birth control (due to loss of pre-ovulatory testosterone, and lower free testosterone levels) increased pill usage would likely not improve the problem. Finally, there is no long term data on using BCPs continuously. With intensive scrutiny for almost fifty years, the largest studies have not suggested a link between BCP use and development of breast cancer.
For some women there is a strong symbolic link between regular menstruation and their concept of femininity. There is a subculture of menstrual rituals including the use of washable menstrual pads, then using the soaking water to water plants. The loss of the cyclic rituals, shared or private, might be mourned with the absence of regular flows.
Am I a Good Candidate to Try and Eliminate My Periods?
Only your own GYN or clinic can give you a conclusive answer. Yet, if you are a successful and satisfied user of hormonal forms of birth control you could easily try an extended use regimen. Your own GYN can discuss the various options such as the FDA approved Lybrel or even using your current method without a hormone free week. Whatever you try, just remember you can always decide to bail out and try something else.
Related Topics: Technorati Tags: birth control, no period, womens health





